https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111534 Rule 66 of the Assam Plantation Labour Rules, 1956 protects occupation of company accommodation only in specified situations, including a dispute as to discharge from service; a dispute over refusal to extend service after superannuation does not fall within that protection, so continued retention of the quarter is not justified on that basis. A complaint under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 may proceed where it prima facie alleges wrongful withholding of company property, and at the quashing stage the court will not test the truth of the allegations. On that footing, cognizance and issuance of process were treated as sustainable. en-us Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:37:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111534 Rule 66 of the Assam Plantation Labour Rules, 1956 protects occupation of company accommodation only in specified situations, including a dispute as to discharge from service; a dispute over refusal to extend service after superannuation does not fall within that protection, so continued retention of the quarter is not justified on that basis. A complaint under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 may proceed where it prima facie alleges wrongful withholding of company property, and at the quashing stage the court will not test the truth of the allegations. On that footing, cognizance and issuance of process were treated as sustainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111534