<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 265 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111532</link>
    <description>Subsequent settlement of secured creditors&#039; dues and other material post-order developments justified recall of the winding up order, because the company&#039;s financial position had materially changed after the original finding of non-viability. Once the secured debts were discharged, the question of revival required fresh consideration by the specialised rehabilitation forum rather than a final judicial closure. The reference was therefore rejected and the matter remitted for reconsideration of rehabilitation on the basis of a new proposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:36:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 265 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111532</link>
      <description>Subsequent settlement of secured creditors&#039; dues and other material post-order developments justified recall of the winding up order, because the company&#039;s financial position had materially changed after the original finding of non-viability. Once the secured debts were discharged, the question of revival required fresh consideration by the specialised rehabilitation forum rather than a final judicial closure. The reference was therefore rejected and the matter remitted for reconsideration of rehabilitation on the basis of a new proposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>