<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 531 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the order-in-appeal, ruling in favor of the appellants in a case involving the importation of diagnostic chemicals without the required license. The judge found that the appellants, who were regular importers, had no intent to violate the Exim Policy as the goods were mistakenly sent through courier mode by the overseas supplier. The penalty imposed was deemed unjustified as the appellants were not at fault. Additionally, the judge condoned the confiscation of goods, noting that no deceptive practices were involved. Consequently, the appellants were granted relief as the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 531 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the order-in-appeal, ruling in favor of the appellants in a case involving the importation of diagnostic chemicals without the required license. The judge found that the appellants, who were regular importers, had no intent to violate the Exim Policy as the goods were mistakenly sent through courier mode by the overseas supplier. The penalty imposed was deemed unjustified as the appellants were not at fault. Additionally, the judge condoned the confiscation of goods, noting that no deceptive practices were involved. Consequently, the appellants were granted relief as the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>