https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111524 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, found the appellants in violation of rules in accounting goods in the production record RG-1, leading to penalties being upheld. However, the liability to confiscation under Rule 173Q was deemed inapplicable, and the penalty on the individual under Rule 209A was set aside. The tribunal allowed the appeals, addressing the issues comprehensively and providing a detailed analysis of the legal matters involved. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:27:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111524 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, found the appellants in violation of rules in accounting goods in the production record RG-1, leading to penalties being upheld. However, the liability to confiscation under Rule 173Q was deemed inapplicable, and the penalty on the individual under Rule 209A was set aside. The tribunal allowed the appeals, addressing the issues comprehensively and providing a detailed analysis of the legal matters involved. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111524