https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111520 The court upheld the lower court's decision, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the order dated February 13, 2002. The court found that the respondent's claim was not time-barred, noting the appellant's acknowledgment of the debt through actions and communications. The judgment affirmed the directed amount and interest rate, rejecting the appeal and cross-objection for lack of valid grounds. Justice Tapan Kumar Dutt concurred with the decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and cross-objection. en-us Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:17:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111520 The court upheld the lower court's decision, dismissing the appellant's challenge to the order dated February 13, 2002. The court found that the respondent's claim was not time-barred, noting the appellant's acknowledgment of the debt through actions and communications. The judgment affirmed the directed amount and interest rate, rejecting the appeal and cross-objection for lack of valid grounds. Justice Tapan Kumar Dutt concurred with the decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and cross-objection. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111520