https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111512 A registered power of attorney authorising commencement and conduct of proceedings remains effective despite omission of its execution date in a photocopy where the original registration and authority are established; retrospective authorisation may also validate the petition. In an appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, factual findings of the Company Law Board are not displaced merely because another view is possible, unless they are perverse, unsupported by evidence, or legally erroneous. Board resolutions appointing directors, increasing authorised capital, or allotting shares require proper notice to existing directors. Parties controlling business records may bear the burden of substantiating asserted appointments and share issuances, particularly in a fiduciary setting. en-us Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:42:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111512 A registered power of attorney authorising commencement and conduct of proceedings remains effective despite omission of its execution date in a photocopy where the original registration and authority are established; retrospective authorisation may also validate the petition. In an appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, factual findings of the Company Law Board are not displaced merely because another view is possible, unless they are perverse, unsupported by evidence, or legally erroneous. Board resolutions appointing directors, increasing authorised capital, or allotting shares require proper notice to existing directors. Parties controlling business records may bear the burden of substantiating asserted appointments and share issuances, particularly in a fiduciary setting. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111512