https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111512 A registered power of attorney, even if a photocopy omits the execution date, may validly authorise initiation and conduct of proceedings, and retrospective confirmation can cure the omission. The note also states that in challenges under section 10F of the Companies Act, factual findings of the Company Law Board are not to be disturbed unless they are perverse, unsupported by evidence, or based on legal error. It further notes that alleged resolutions for appointment of directors, enhancement of authorised capital, and allotment of shares cannot stand where existing directors were not shown to have received proper notice. On these facts, the appellate challenge failed because no substantial question of law arose. en-us Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:42:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111512 A registered power of attorney, even if a photocopy omits the execution date, may validly authorise initiation and conduct of proceedings, and retrospective confirmation can cure the omission. The note also states that in challenges under section 10F of the Companies Act, factual findings of the Company Law Board are not to be disturbed unless they are perverse, unsupported by evidence, or based on legal error. It further notes that alleged resolutions for appointment of directors, enhancement of authorised capital, and allotment of shares cannot stand where existing directors were not shown to have received proper notice. On these facts, the appellate challenge failed because no substantial question of law arose. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 19 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111512