<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 328 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111508</link>
    <description>Civil court jurisdiction is not excluded unless the statutory bar is express or necessarily implied, and the plaint must clearly disclose that the suit falls within that bar. On the pleaded facts, the suit was treated as enforcing an asserted civil right arising from a listing arrangement and revocation-related events, so jurisdiction could not be held barred from the plaint alone. Where the objection depends on disputed factual matters, including alleged non-compliance with revocation conditions and later withdrawal of revocation, those issues require evidence and cannot be conclusively decided at the preliminary stage. The matter was therefore directed to proceed to trial, with jurisdictional and related defences to be determined after evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:34:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 328 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111508</link>
      <description>Civil court jurisdiction is not excluded unless the statutory bar is express or necessarily implied, and the plaint must clearly disclose that the suit falls within that bar. On the pleaded facts, the suit was treated as enforcing an asserted civil right arising from a listing arrangement and revocation-related events, so jurisdiction could not be held barred from the plaint alone. Where the objection depends on disputed factual matters, including alleged non-compliance with revocation conditions and later withdrawal of revocation, those issues require evidence and cannot be conclusively decided at the preliminary stage. The matter was therefore directed to proceed to trial, with jurisdictional and related defences to be determined after evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>