https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111504 The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal as infructuous since the shares were registered in the name of the original transferee. The Court clarified that the Board's direction for the original transferee did not automatically apply to the subsequent transferee, as their rights were distinct. Legal questions were left open for future cases, and no costs were awarded in the matter. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Oct 2017 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111504 The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal as infructuous since the shares were registered in the name of the original transferee. The Court clarified that the Board's direction for the original transferee did not automatically apply to the subsequent transferee, as their rights were distinct. Legal questions were left open for future cases, and no costs were awarded in the matter. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111504