<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 515 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111501</link>
    <description>The appeal by M/s. Bhor Industries was dismissed ex parte due to alleged non-receipt of hearing notice following a change of address. The Tribunal found that the appellants had informed the registry of the new address, which was not updated, leading to the missed hearing. Considering this, the Tribunal recalled the ex parte order and restored the appeal, allowing the appellants a fair chance to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 515 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111501</link>
      <description>The appeal by M/s. Bhor Industries was dismissed ex parte due to alleged non-receipt of hearing notice following a change of address. The Tribunal found that the appellants had informed the registry of the new address, which was not updated, leading to the missed hearing. Considering this, the Tribunal recalled the ex parte order and restored the appeal, allowing the appellants a fair chance to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>