<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 263 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111473</link>
    <description>The Court held that amalgamation does not require an increase in share capital, following previous decisions and aligning with the Delhi High Court judgment. The order disallowing Clause 10 of the Scheme was set aside in one appeal, while the other appeals were dismissed. The Company Petitions were referred back to the Single Judge based on the judgment outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 263 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111473</link>
      <description>The Court held that amalgamation does not require an increase in share capital, following previous decisions and aligning with the Delhi High Court judgment. The order disallowing Clause 10 of the Scheme was set aside in one appeal, while the other appeals were dismissed. The Company Petitions were referred back to the Single Judge based on the judgment outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>