<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 506 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111455</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay in filing the Modvat declaration validated the earlier credit entry and related it back to the original date on which credit was first taken. The Tribunal held that, once delay was condoned, the assessee could not be denied Modvat credit merely because the credit was not taken within six months from the date of condonation. The credit was therefore admissible, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:08:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 506 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111455</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay in filing the Modvat declaration validated the earlier credit entry and related it back to the original date on which credit was first taken. The Tribunal held that, once delay was condoned, the assessee could not be denied Modvat credit merely because the credit was not taken within six months from the date of condonation. The credit was therefore admissible, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>