<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 494 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111434</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the conclusion that service charges should not be included in the imported goods&#039; value. The spares imported with the machines were correctly assessed separately. The assessable value was to be recalculated based on these findings, granting the appellants partial relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:09:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 494 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111434</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the conclusion that service charges should not be included in the imported goods&#039; value. The spares imported with the machines were correctly assessed separately. The assessable value was to be recalculated based on these findings, granting the appellants partial relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>