https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111427 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellants, ruling that the demand was barred by limitation. It was found that the practice of maintaining two sets of invoices by the appellant company was known to Revenue Authorities, and there was no evidence of intent to evade duty. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:01:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111427 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed on the appellants, ruling that the demand was barred by limitation. It was found that the practice of maintaining two sets of invoices by the appellant company was known to Revenue Authorities, and there was no evidence of intent to evade duty. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111427