https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111417 A pre-deposit direction will not be disturbed in writ jurisdiction where the appellate authority has considered the prima facie merits and fixed the deposit on a rational basis. The Tribunal had examined the appeal at a preliminary stage, noted that the adjudication order was not ex facie defective, and quantified the deposit after excluding amounts covered by granted extensions; the High Court found no ground to interfere. The Court also held that a director who was on the Board during the relevant period could be directed to comply with the pre-deposit order, while the petitioner who was not a director at that time was spared the deposit requirement at that stage. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:47:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111417 A pre-deposit direction will not be disturbed in writ jurisdiction where the appellate authority has considered the prima facie merits and fixed the deposit on a rational basis. The Tribunal had examined the appeal at a preliminary stage, noted that the adjudication order was not ex facie defective, and quantified the deposit after excluding amounts covered by granted extensions; the High Court found no ground to interfere. The Court also held that a director who was on the Board during the relevant period could be directed to comply with the pre-deposit order, while the petitioner who was not a director at that time was spared the deposit requirement at that stage. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111417