https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111414 The appeals challenging the Bombay High Court's affirmation of the Arbitral Tribunal's decision on a limitation objection were dismissed. The dispute between a stock and share broker (appellant) and the respondent over outstanding dues was found time-barred under the National Stock Exchange of India Limited's bye-laws. The court upheld the decision that the complaint, filed beyond the prescribed six-month limit, was not timely, emphasizing the importance of adhering to specified time limits for filing complaints under the exchange's rules. en-us Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111414 The appeals challenging the Bombay High Court's affirmation of the Arbitral Tribunal's decision on a limitation objection were dismissed. The dispute between a stock and share broker (appellant) and the respondent over outstanding dues was found time-barred under the National Stock Exchange of India Limited's bye-laws. The court upheld the decision that the complaint, filed beyond the prescribed six-month limit, was not timely, emphasizing the importance of adhering to specified time limits for filing complaints under the exchange's rules. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111414