https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111410 The Supreme Court upheld the National Commission's decision in a case involving a claim for flood damage and building collapse. The Court found that the insurance policy covered flood damage without excluding subsidence, ruling the company's repudiation unjustified. Additionally, the Court emphasized the impact of floodwater on the building collapse, dismissing the company's argument of poor construction as a reason to deny the claim. This judgment underscores the significance of careful policy review and factual assessment in insurance claim disputes. en-us Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111410 The Supreme Court upheld the National Commission's decision in a case involving a claim for flood damage and building collapse. The Court found that the insurance policy covered flood damage without excluding subsidence, ruling the company's repudiation unjustified. Additionally, the Court emphasized the impact of floodwater on the building collapse, dismissing the company's argument of poor construction as a reason to deny the claim. This judgment underscores the significance of careful policy review and factual assessment in insurance claim disputes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111410