<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 225 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111408</link>
    <description>The court upheld the interlocutory order allowing former directors to inspect and obtain copies of specific documents from the company. The court found no error in granting the inspection, noting the former directors&#039; previous access to company affairs during their tenure. The appeal was dismissed, with the appellants directed to provide the documents to the respondents. Subsequently, the appellants agreed to comply with the order, leading to the resolution of the matter as the respondents decided not to pursue a contempt application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:24:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 225 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111408</link>
      <description>The court upheld the interlocutory order allowing former directors to inspect and obtain copies of specific documents from the company. The court found no error in granting the inspection, noting the former directors&#039; previous access to company affairs during their tenure. The appeal was dismissed, with the appellants directed to provide the documents to the respondents. Subsequently, the appellants agreed to comply with the order, leading to the resolution of the matter as the respondents decided not to pursue a contempt application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>