<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 488 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111403</link>
    <description>No clandestine production or removal was established where the goods consisted of raw materials and items at different stages of manufacture, and the shortage of input credit had already been reversed. The real default was failure to make proper entries in excise records, so confiscation and the harsher penalty under Rule 173Q and the Revenue&#039;s demanded statutory penalty were not justified. The appropriate consequence was only the limited penalty for the recording lapse, and the enhanced sanctions were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:35:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 488 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111403</link>
      <description>No clandestine production or removal was established where the goods consisted of raw materials and items at different stages of manufacture, and the shortage of input credit had already been reversed. The real default was failure to make proper entries in excise records, so confiscation and the harsher penalty under Rule 173Q and the Revenue&#039;s demanded statutory penalty were not justified. The appropriate consequence was only the limited penalty for the recording lapse, and the enhanced sanctions were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>