<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 516 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111390</link>
    <description>Where an extended-period central excise demand is accepted and remains undisputed, the statutory consequences of penalty and interest follow. The text states that invocation of the proviso to Section 11A(1) was accepted, so penalty under Section 11AC and interest under Section 11AB became leviable. It also notes that immediate reversal of duty after detection by Central Excise officers was relevant to moderating the penalty quantum. On those facts, penalty and interest were upheld, while the penalty amount was reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:23:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 516 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111390</link>
      <description>Where an extended-period central excise demand is accepted and remains undisputed, the statutory consequences of penalty and interest follow. The text states that invocation of the proviso to Section 11A(1) was accepted, so penalty under Section 11AC and interest under Section 11AB became leviable. It also notes that immediate reversal of duty after detection by Central Excise officers was relevant to moderating the penalty quantum. On those facts, penalty and interest were upheld, while the penalty amount was reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>