<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 343 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111374</link>
    <description>Article 21 privacy is not absolute and may yield to lawful statutory authority and countervailing public interest. In the SARFAESI context, the proposed publication of a defaulting borrower&#039;s photograph in newspapers was treated as a permissible recovery measure and not an unlawful invasion of privacy. The text also states that writ relief was inappropriate where the challenge arose from SARFAESI enforcement steps and an effective statutory appeal was available, so the writ petition was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:37:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 343 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111374</link>
      <description>Article 21 privacy is not absolute and may yield to lawful statutory authority and countervailing public interest. In the SARFAESI context, the proposed publication of a defaulting borrower&#039;s photograph in newspapers was treated as a permissible recovery measure and not an unlawful invasion of privacy. The text also states that writ relief was inappropriate where the challenge arose from SARFAESI enforcement steps and an effective statutory appeal was available, so the writ petition was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>