<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 339 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111370</link>
    <description>Proceedings under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act are confined to ministerial assistance by the Magistrate in taking possession of secured assets, without adjudicating competing claims over title or possession. A borrower or transferee&#039;s remedies against the secured creditor&#039;s measures lie under section 17, not in section 14 proceedings. In a revision or section 482 petition challenging refusal to act under section 14, the revisional court likewise does not determine those rights, so the notice requirement under section 401(2) CrPC does not apply. Notice to the borrower or transferee was therefore not mandatory, and a direction to issue notice was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 339 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111370</link>
      <description>Proceedings under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act are confined to ministerial assistance by the Magistrate in taking possession of secured assets, without adjudicating competing claims over title or possession. A borrower or transferee&#039;s remedies against the secured creditor&#039;s measures lie under section 17, not in section 14 proceedings. In a revision or section 482 petition challenging refusal to act under section 14, the revisional court likewise does not determine those rights, so the notice requirement under section 401(2) CrPC does not apply. Notice to the borrower or transferee was therefore not mandatory, and a direction to issue notice was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>