<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 337 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111368</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the appeals in the case, setting aside decisions on the validity of the AGM notice, issuance of right shares, and issuance of duplicate shares. It upheld the decision to set aside the election of eight directors but rejected the re-appointment of retiring directors. The court directed the company to conduct the 12th AGM by a specified date and granted NRI shareholders one month to accept the right shares offer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 337 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111368</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the appeals in the case, setting aside decisions on the validity of the AGM notice, issuance of right shares, and issuance of duplicate shares. It upheld the decision to set aside the election of eight directors but rejected the re-appointment of retiring directors. The court directed the company to conduct the 12th AGM by a specified date and granted NRI shareholders one month to accept the right shares offer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>