https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111360 The Company Law Board, when deciding a share-registration dispute under section 111 of the Companies Act, is treated as exercising adjudicatory powers with the trappings of a court, so section 5 of the Limitation Act applies through section 29(2) unless expressly excluded. On that basis, delay in filing under section 111(2) can be condoned for sufficient cause. The proceeding may also be treated as an application for rectification under section 111(4), because the appeal and rectification remedies are overlapping rather than mutually exclusive. The limitation objection therefore failed, and maintainability was upheld, leaving the merits of the transmission dispute to be decided. en-us Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:08:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111360 The Company Law Board, when deciding a share-registration dispute under section 111 of the Companies Act, is treated as exercising adjudicatory powers with the trappings of a court, so section 5 of the Limitation Act applies through section 29(2) unless expressly excluded. On that basis, delay in filing under section 111(2) can be condoned for sufficient cause. The proceeding may also be treated as an application for rectification under section 111(4), because the appeal and rectification remedies are overlapping rather than mutually exclusive. The limitation objection therefore failed, and maintainability was upheld, leaving the merits of the transmission dispute to be decided. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111360