<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 335 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111357</link>
    <description>Rule 57Q allowed Modvat credit on capital goods only after installation or actual use in manufacture, with that factual position to be certified by the manufacturer or authorised person. A circular confirmed that credit on machines and machinery could not be taken before installation or use. On the facts, the Band Building Machine and the Triplex Extrusion Line Machine were credited after installation, and installation certificates supported those dates. The adjudicating authority wrongly preferred a 3CD report and relied on another statute to deny the credit. The Modvat credit was therefore admissible, and the denial of credit and the linked penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:55:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 335 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111357</link>
      <description>Rule 57Q allowed Modvat credit on capital goods only after installation or actual use in manufacture, with that factual position to be certified by the manufacturer or authorised person. A circular confirmed that credit on machines and machinery could not be taken before installation or use. On the facts, the Band Building Machine and the Triplex Extrusion Line Machine were credited after installation, and installation certificates supported those dates. The adjudicating authority wrongly preferred a 3CD report and relied on another statute to deny the credit. The Modvat credit was therefore admissible, and the denial of credit and the linked penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>