https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111355 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, denied a request for adjournment due to counsel unavailability in a case involving substantial duty amounts. Despite acknowledging the inconvenience, the tribunal proceeded with the hearing, emphasizing the importance of timely resolution. However, an adjournment was granted under conditions requiring a deposit towards duty and penalty within a month. Non-compliance would lead to dismissal of the appeals and enforcement of amounts due. The tribunal stressed no further adjournments would be allowed, highlighting the need for compliance for fair legal proceedings. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:50:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111355 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, denied a request for adjournment due to counsel unavailability in a case involving substantial duty amounts. Despite acknowledging the inconvenience, the tribunal proceeded with the hearing, emphasizing the importance of timely resolution. However, an adjournment was granted under conditions requiring a deposit towards duty and penalty within a month. Non-compliance would lead to dismissal of the appeals and enforcement of amounts due. The tribunal stressed no further adjournments would be allowed, highlighting the need for compliance for fair legal proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 19 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111355