<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 498 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to reject the abatement claim on the import of the Russian vessel M.V. SYANIE due to the untimely notification of damage, in line with legal precedent that damage occurring after unloading and assessment is not eligible for abatement. The appeal was consequently rejected, affirming the rejection of the abatement claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:24:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 498 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to reject the abatement claim on the import of the Russian vessel M.V. SYANIE due to the untimely notification of damage, in line with legal precedent that damage occurring after unloading and assessment is not eligible for abatement. The appeal was consequently rejected, affirming the rejection of the abatement claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>