https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111333 Article 227 could not be invoked directly against a Magistrate's order in SARFAESI possession proceedings where an efficacious statutory remedy lay before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 after measures under Section 13(4). The court treated the revision as an attempt to bypass the statutory mechanism, noted that proceedings had arisen after notice under Section 13(2) and a request for possession under Section 14, and found no merit on the facts presented. The revision petition was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed. en-us Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:00:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111333 Article 227 could not be invoked directly against a Magistrate's order in SARFAESI possession proceedings where an efficacious statutory remedy lay before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 after measures under Section 13(4). The court treated the revision as an attempt to bypass the statutory mechanism, noted that proceedings had arisen after notice under Section 13(2) and a request for possession under Section 14, and found no merit on the facts presented. The revision petition was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 12 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111333