<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 399 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111310</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to quash criminal proceedings due to a partnership firm&#039;s failure to serve a valid notice under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant&#039;s notice demanding the total outstanding amount, rather than specifically the cheque amount, did not comply with statutory requirements. The court emphasized that a valid notice must demand payment of the cheque amount within 30 days of dishonor. As the appellant&#039;s notice did not meet these requirements, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the quashing of criminal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2021 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 399 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111310</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to quash criminal proceedings due to a partnership firm&#039;s failure to serve a valid notice under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant&#039;s notice demanding the total outstanding amount, rather than specifically the cheque amount, did not comply with statutory requirements. The court emphasized that a valid notice must demand payment of the cheque amount within 30 days of dishonor. As the appellant&#039;s notice did not meet these requirements, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the quashing of criminal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>