<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 402 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111303</link>
    <description>In an amalgamation of a wholly owned subsidiary with its holding company, the Court accepted that a creditors&#039; meeting was unnecessary where creditors were not materially prejudiced and the transferee&#039;s financial position adequately protected their interests. It also held that the transferor&#039;s authorised capital could be clubbed with the transferee&#039;s capital under the scheme without a fresh filing fee, because the vesting under the amalgamation order carried over the relevant corporate incidents by operation of law. After reviewing the financial position, shareholder consent, Official Liquidator&#039;s report and absence of legal infirmity, the Court found the scheme fair, workable and not contrary to public interest, and sanctioned it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2014 22:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 402 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111303</link>
      <description>In an amalgamation of a wholly owned subsidiary with its holding company, the Court accepted that a creditors&#039; meeting was unnecessary where creditors were not materially prejudiced and the transferee&#039;s financial position adequately protected their interests. It also held that the transferor&#039;s authorised capital could be clubbed with the transferee&#039;s capital under the scheme without a fresh filing fee, because the vesting under the amalgamation order carried over the relevant corporate incidents by operation of law. After reviewing the financial position, shareholder consent, Official Liquidator&#039;s report and absence of legal infirmity, the Court found the scheme fair, workable and not contrary to public interest, and sanctioned it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>