https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111301 A complaint against bank officials based on an inadvertent misdescription of pending litigation in a prospectus did not disclose personal criminal liability, because no specific averments showed how any individual officer was responsible for the alleged acts. In proceedings under sections 156(3) and 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Magistrate must apply judicial mind to whether the complaint, on its face, discloses an offence against each accused. An order directing investigation that proceeded on an incorrect understanding of the accused's roles and lacked such application of mind was liable to be set aside. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 May 2014 16:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111301 A complaint against bank officials based on an inadvertent misdescription of pending litigation in a prospectus did not disclose personal criminal liability, because no specific averments showed how any individual officer was responsible for the alleged acts. In proceedings under sections 156(3) and 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Magistrate must apply judicial mind to whether the complaint, on its face, discloses an offence against each accused. An order directing investigation that proceeded on an incorrect understanding of the accused's roles and lacked such application of mind was liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111301