<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 443 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111294</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, setting aside the Company Law Board&#039;s direction excluding beneficial owners from the membership list. The Court emphasized that the register of members should include beneficial owners as per the Companies Act, 1956, and post the Depositories Act, 1996. The respondent was mandated to provide a comprehensive list of members, incorporating beneficial owners, in adherence to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 443 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111294</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, setting aside the Company Law Board&#039;s direction excluding beneficial owners from the membership list. The Court emphasized that the register of members should include beneficial owners as per the Companies Act, 1956, and post the Depositories Act, 1996. The respondent was mandated to provide a comprehensive list of members, incorporating beneficial owners, in adherence to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>