https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111291 Bihar Government companies covered by the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 were treated as continuing to function in the areas in which they had operated immediately before the appointed day, by virtue of their inclusion in the Ninth Schedule and the operation of sections 46(4) and 65. The court held that the scheme of the Inter-State Corporations Act, 1957 did not require prior amendment of the Schedule for the reorganisation law to operate, because section 5 was only enabling. In the absence of an enacted law, inter-State agreement, or Central Government direction, the companies could not be treated as liable to winding up on the grounds urged, and the winding up petitions were dismissed. en-us Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Dec 2014 12:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111291 Bihar Government companies covered by the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 were treated as continuing to function in the areas in which they had operated immediately before the appointed day, by virtue of their inclusion in the Ninth Schedule and the operation of sections 46(4) and 65. The court held that the scheme of the Inter-State Corporations Act, 1957 did not require prior amendment of the Schedule for the reorganisation law to operate, because section 5 was only enabling. In the absence of an enacted law, inter-State agreement, or Central Government direction, the companies could not be treated as liable to winding up on the grounds urged, and the winding up petitions were dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111291