https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111290 Writ jurisdiction remained available because the challenge concerned the appellate forum's competence and the validity of a stock exchange bye-law, notwithstanding remedies under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Bye-law 274A was valid when construed as permitting an optional second submission to arbitration rather than creating a statutory appellate hierarchy. However, a section 16 decision on arbitral jurisdiction is an order, not an award. As Bye-law 274A permits appeals only from awards, the appellate tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal from that order; the prescribed remedy lies under section 37(2). The appellate order remitting the dispute to arbitration was set aside. en-us Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Dec 2014 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111290 Writ jurisdiction remained available because the challenge concerned the appellate forum's competence and the validity of a stock exchange bye-law, notwithstanding remedies under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Bye-law 274A was valid when construed as permitting an optional second submission to arbitration rather than creating a statutory appellate hierarchy. However, a section 16 decision on arbitral jurisdiction is an order, not an award. As Bye-law 274A permits appeals only from awards, the appellate tribunal lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal from that order; the prescribed remedy lies under section 37(2). The appellate order remitting the dispute to arbitration was set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 23 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111290