<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 397 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111281</link>
    <description>Once winding up commences, a secured creditor&#039;s claims, including interest, are governed by the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, with liabilities fixed as on the winding-up date. The secured creditor cannot bypass the statutory distribution scheme under sections 529, 529A and 530 by relying on the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, and post-winding-up interest is payable only if surplus remains after admitted claims are satisfied. A payment made by the ex-managing director on behalf of the company was validly credited by the official liquidator against the outstanding liability because there was no proof that it related exclusively to post-winding-up interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:26:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 397 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111281</link>
      <description>Once winding up commences, a secured creditor&#039;s claims, including interest, are governed by the Companies Act, 1956 and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, with liabilities fixed as on the winding-up date. The secured creditor cannot bypass the statutory distribution scheme under sections 529, 529A and 530 by relying on the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, and post-winding-up interest is payable only if surplus remains after admitted claims are satisfied. A payment made by the ex-managing director on behalf of the company was validly credited by the official liquidator against the outstanding liability because there was no proof that it related exclusively to post-winding-up interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>