<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 335 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111273</link>
    <description>For a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, proper dispatch of the statutory notice by registered post to the correct address can trigger the presumption of service under section 27 of the General Clauses Act, supported by section 114 of the Evidence Act. A complainant need not, at the pleading stage, specifically aver that the drawer deliberately evaded service or had actual knowledge of the notice if basic facts of due dispatch are stated. The presumption remains rebuttable, and the drawer may challenge service by showing a wrong address, non-tender of the notice, or an incorrect postal endorsement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 335 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111273</link>
      <description>For a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, proper dispatch of the statutory notice by registered post to the correct address can trigger the presumption of service under section 27 of the General Clauses Act, supported by section 114 of the Evidence Act. A complainant need not, at the pleading stage, specifically aver that the drawer deliberately evaded service or had actual knowledge of the notice if basic facts of due dispatch are stated. The presumption remains rebuttable, and the drawer may challenge service by showing a wrong address, non-tender of the notice, or an incorrect postal endorsement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>