<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 334 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111272</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the Board&#039;s approval of the valuation report by M/s. Patni and Company for the target company&#039;s shares. The Court found the valuation compliant with Regulation 20(5) of the Takeover Code and in the best interest of shareholders. It emphasized limited judicial interference in technical valuation matters, noting the valuer&#039;s consideration of all relevant factors and adherence to accepted principles. The Board&#039;s discretion in appointing the valuer was deemed reasonable, and the Court concluded no fundamental errors or arbitrariness in the valuation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 334 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111272</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, upholding the Board&#039;s approval of the valuation report by M/s. Patni and Company for the target company&#039;s shares. The Court found the valuation compliant with Regulation 20(5) of the Takeover Code and in the best interest of shareholders. It emphasized limited judicial interference in technical valuation matters, noting the valuer&#039;s consideration of all relevant factors and adherence to accepted principles. The Board&#039;s discretion in appointing the valuer was deemed reasonable, and the Court concluded no fundamental errors or arbitrariness in the valuation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>