<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 331 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111269</link>
    <description>Pre-emptive rights under Article 8 required newly issued shares to be offered first to existing shareholders. Allotment to a non-member without complying with that requirement was treated as illegal and void, which also invalidated a subsequent transfer of part of those shares to the appellant; the company was permitted to re-allot the shares lawfully to existing shareholders. By contrast, Article 22 permitted transfer of shares to an existing member or family member without the transfer-notice procedure under Article 23. Since the transferee was an existing shareholder and the Board approved the transaction, the transfer was valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:33:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 331 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111269</link>
      <description>Pre-emptive rights under Article 8 required newly issued shares to be offered first to existing shareholders. Allotment to a non-member without complying with that requirement was treated as illegal and void, which also invalidated a subsequent transfer of part of those shares to the appellant; the company was permitted to re-allot the shares lawfully to existing shareholders. By contrast, Article 22 permitted transfer of shares to an existing member or family member without the transfer-notice procedure under Article 23. Since the transferee was an existing shareholder and the Board approved the transaction, the transfer was valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>