<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 374 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111263</link>
    <description>The court dismissed all writ applications, upholding the validity of AS-22. It ruled that the Accounting Standard is consistent with the Companies Act and the Constitution, ensuring the company&#039;s financial statements present a true and fair view. The court found no merit in arguments regarding the ultra vires nature, conflict with statutory provisions, inconsistency with Schedule VI, retrospective application, or the nature of deferred tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:09:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 374 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111263</link>
      <description>The court dismissed all writ applications, upholding the validity of AS-22. It ruled that the Accounting Standard is consistent with the Companies Act and the Constitution, ensuring the company&#039;s financial statements present a true and fair view. The court found no merit in arguments regarding the ultra vires nature, conflict with statutory provisions, inconsistency with Schedule VI, retrospective application, or the nature of deferred tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>