<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 366 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111255</link>
    <description>An English judgment was treated as conclusive for enforcement because the parties had agreed to English jurisdiction and the judgment was reasoned and based on evidence, even though the respondent did not appear. A creditor may rely on such a foreign decree in winding up proceedings, and the company&#039;s failure to answer statutory notice, together with uncontroverted material showing substantial liabilities, erosion of net worth, and financial incapacity, supported a finding of commercial insolvency. The petition was therefore maintainable and the company was regarded as unable to pay its debts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 366 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111255</link>
      <description>An English judgment was treated as conclusive for enforcement because the parties had agreed to English jurisdiction and the judgment was reasoned and based on evidence, even though the respondent did not appear. A creditor may rely on such a foreign decree in winding up proceedings, and the company&#039;s failure to answer statutory notice, together with uncontroverted material showing substantial liabilities, erosion of net worth, and financial incapacity, supported a finding of commercial insolvency. The petition was therefore maintainable and the company was regarded as unable to pay its debts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>