<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 365 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111254</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the decision of the Company Judge, ruling that the notice of demand was not validly served at the registered office address of the respondent company due to a valid change of address recorded with the Registrar of Companies. The Court emphasized timely compliance with statutory requirements, dismissed the appeal, and highlighted the Registrar&#039;s duty to promptly update records to avoid unreasonable delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 13:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 365 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111254</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the decision of the Company Judge, ruling that the notice of demand was not validly served at the registered office address of the respondent company due to a valid change of address recorded with the Registrar of Companies. The Court emphasized timely compliance with statutory requirements, dismissed the appeal, and highlighted the Registrar&#039;s duty to promptly update records to avoid unreasonable delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>