https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111243 The Supreme Court held that the High Court of Punjab & Haryana lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court found that the essential parts of the cause of action did not arise within the jurisdiction of Punjab & Haryana, as the key events and decisions were predominantly centered in Sikkim. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision and ordering each party to bear their own costs. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Oct 2015 14:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111243 The Supreme Court held that the High Court of Punjab & Haryana lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court found that the essential parts of the cause of action did not arise within the jurisdiction of Punjab & Haryana, as the key events and decisions were predominantly centered in Sikkim. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision and ordering each party to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111243