https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111237 The High Court upheld previous judgments, dismissing the appeal regarding interest on dividend. The impugned order was found appropriate as it addressed the terms of the consent order, settling all claims. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission lacked jurisdiction over the financial dispute dating back to 1986, advising seeking relief elsewhere. The Supreme Court dismissed subsequent applications, affirming the lack of merit in the appeal. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:05:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111237 The High Court upheld previous judgments, dismissing the appeal regarding interest on dividend. The impugned order was found appropriate as it addressed the terms of the consent order, settling all claims. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission lacked jurisdiction over the financial dispute dating back to 1986, advising seeking relief elsewhere. The Supreme Court dismissed subsequent applications, affirming the lack of merit in the appeal. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111237