<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 315 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111224</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between the petitioner Company, Aksh Optifibre Limited, and Transferor-company, Aksh Broadband Limited, under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court emphasized compliance with statutory procedures, requisite majority vote, fairness, absence of coercion, and commercial reasonableness. Despite objections raised by the Regional Director regarding pending winding-up petitions against the transferor company, the court found the scheme just, fair, and reasonable, not prejudicial to creditors, and in the shareholders&#039; interest. The court allowed the petition, sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation, and awarded costs to the Official Liquidator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:12:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 315 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111224</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between the petitioner Company, Aksh Optifibre Limited, and Transferor-company, Aksh Broadband Limited, under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court emphasized compliance with statutory procedures, requisite majority vote, fairness, absence of coercion, and commercial reasonableness. Despite objections raised by the Regional Director regarding pending winding-up petitions against the transferor company, the court found the scheme just, fair, and reasonable, not prejudicial to creditors, and in the shareholders&#039; interest. The court allowed the petition, sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation, and awarded costs to the Official Liquidator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>