https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111222 A tenant claiming rent control protection cannot use that status to block a secured creditor from taking possession under the SARFAESI Act, because the Act gives overriding effect to enforcement measures taken under section 13(4) and contemplates recovery of possession without court intervention. Where tenancy rights are disputed or the tenancy is not binding on the secured creditor, the proper forum for challenge is the Debts Recovery Tribunal under section 17, including any claim for restoration if dispossession was not in accordance with law. Rights created by a mortgagor cannot defeat statutory enforcement of the security interest. en-us Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:55:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111222 A tenant claiming rent control protection cannot use that status to block a secured creditor from taking possession under the SARFAESI Act, because the Act gives overriding effect to enforcement measures taken under section 13(4) and contemplates recovery of possession without court intervention. Where tenancy rights are disputed or the tenancy is not binding on the secured creditor, the proper forum for challenge is the Debts Recovery Tribunal under section 17, including any claim for restoration if dispossession was not in accordance with law. Rights created by a mortgagor cannot defeat statutory enforcement of the security interest. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111222