https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111218 A scheme framed under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was treated as having statutory force and overriding effect under section 32 over inconsistent provisions of other laws, including the Employees' State Insurance Corporation's claim to decide interest on outstanding dues independently. The discussion notes that the scheme itself provided for payment to the Corporation, that the issue was jurisdictional, and that the Corporation had submitted to the BIFR process. In a conflict between special enactments, the later special enactment was said to prevail, making the BIFR the proper authority to determine interest and payability under the rehabilitation scheme. en-us Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:34:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111218 A scheme framed under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was treated as having statutory force and overriding effect under section 32 over inconsistent provisions of other laws, including the Employees' State Insurance Corporation's claim to decide interest on outstanding dues independently. The discussion notes that the scheme itself provided for payment to the Corporation, that the issue was jurisdictional, and that the Corporation had submitted to the BIFR process. In a conflict between special enactments, the later special enactment was said to prevail, making the BIFR the proper authority to determine interest and payability under the rehabilitation scheme. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111218