<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 488 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111211</link>
    <description>SSI exemption was available where the claimant factory was registered as an SSI unit and satisfied the prescribed notification conditions, even though the brand name holder had not itself availed the exemption. The decisive factor was the brand name owner&#039;s eligibility under the notification, not actual use of the benefit by that owner. Earlier decisions recognising the distinction between eligibility and actual availment were applied, and denial of exemption on the ground that the brand name holder had not taken the benefit was held unsustainable. The brand name users were therefore entitled to the SSI exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 488 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111211</link>
      <description>SSI exemption was available where the claimant factory was registered as an SSI unit and satisfied the prescribed notification conditions, even though the brand name holder had not itself availed the exemption. The decisive factor was the brand name owner&#039;s eligibility under the notification, not actual use of the benefit by that owner. Earlier decisions recognising the distinction between eligibility and actual availment were applied, and denial of exemption on the ground that the brand name holder had not taken the benefit was held unsustainable. The brand name users were therefore entitled to the SSI exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>