<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 483 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111201</link>
    <description>Duty-paid transformers found in the premises of a unit that did not manufacture transformers could not be confiscated absent a specific contravention under the Central Excise Rules. The record showed that the goods were manufactured by one appellant and merely located in the premises of another appellant engaged in paper coated wire manufacture. The notice and orders did not establish any breach justifying confiscation or penalty, and the re-entry restriction on duty-paid goods was construed as applying to goods manufactured by the assessee or similar goods, not to unrelated goods received from another manufacturer. The confiscation and penalties were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:10:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 483 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111201</link>
      <description>Duty-paid transformers found in the premises of a unit that did not manufacture transformers could not be confiscated absent a specific contravention under the Central Excise Rules. The record showed that the goods were manufactured by one appellant and merely located in the premises of another appellant engaged in paper coated wire manufacture. The notice and orders did not establish any breach justifying confiscation or penalty, and the re-entry restriction on duty-paid goods was construed as applying to goods manufactured by the assessee or similar goods, not to unrelated goods received from another manufacturer. The confiscation and penalties were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>