<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 291 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111199</link>
    <description>The Court approved the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, despite objections raised by the Regional Director regarding the transfer of authorized capital. The Court overruled the objections, emphasizing the benefits of the merger in terms of synergy, coordination, and cost savings. The decision was based on unanimous approval by both companies, absence of creditor objections, compliance with legal procedures, and alignment with public policy. The Court also awarded a fee to the Additional Central Government Standing Counsel and incorporated previous orders into the sanction order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 291 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111199</link>
      <description>The Court approved the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, despite objections raised by the Regional Director regarding the transfer of authorized capital. The Court overruled the objections, emphasizing the benefits of the merger in terms of synergy, coordination, and cost savings. The decision was based on unanimous approval by both companies, absence of creditor objections, compliance with legal procedures, and alignment with public policy. The Court also awarded a fee to the Additional Central Government Standing Counsel and incorporated previous orders into the sanction order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>