<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 477 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111190</link>
    <description>The exemption notification did not require production of end-use certificates as a condition for availing the benefit, and the record did not prima facie show use of the imported goods outside the leather industry, which was the relevant condition under the notification. On that basis, a prima facie case was made out for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:53:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 477 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111190</link>
      <description>The exemption notification did not require production of end-use certificates as a condition for availing the benefit, and the record did not prima facie show use of the imported goods outside the leather industry, which was the relevant condition under the notification. On that basis, a prima facie case was made out for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>