https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111181 The court dismissed the application seeking permission to file a joint company application for the amalgamation of two companies with registered offices in the same state. The court found the request for a joint petition unnecessary, emphasizing that separate applications based on registered office jurisdiction would not cause prejudice or inconvenience. The judge highlighted that the reasons cited for the joint application were deemed unnecessary litigation, as the paperwork and time involved would not significantly differ from filing separate applications. The court emphasized the importance of following the ordinary procedure of separate applications for amalgamation by transferor and transferee companies. en-us Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:25:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111181 The court dismissed the application seeking permission to file a joint company application for the amalgamation of two companies with registered offices in the same state. The court found the request for a joint petition unnecessary, emphasizing that separate applications based on registered office jurisdiction would not cause prejudice or inconvenience. The judge highlighted that the reasons cited for the joint application were deemed unnecessary litigation, as the paperwork and time involved would not significantly differ from filing separate applications. The court emphasized the importance of following the ordinary procedure of separate applications for amalgamation by transferor and transferee companies. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 11 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111181